?

Log in

God in many aspects or just one? - Debate God [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
debate_god

[ website | Website FAQ ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| Religious Tolerance ]

God in many aspects or just one? [Aug. 30th, 2005|10:46 pm]
debate_god

debate_god

[dulcimergurl]
hello, I recently joined this community and would like to open up a topic of discussion.
How can people only see one aspect of God if God is indefinite and all-powerful and huge? How can we even claim to know all the aspects of God, to know all of God? How can we as measley humans think that is possible? I don't think we can lable God into only three parts and that's it, there's always going to be more to learn about God, and some of it probably won't fit into one of those parts of God that is supposedly all of God. But if labeling God into three specific parts really confining Him to these aspects? No, of course not, God will do and be whoever He wants to be. However, it might confine the way we look at God, which I really don't like people doing. I cannot fathom the full extent of God, so how can we think we can fathom Him as only one of our beings? He is certainly more than that in all the ways we don't see it.
i used He as a pronoun for God, yes yes i know gender specific=bad, but it's just easier, i don't know the gender of God, i was just calling it a Him, would you prefer it or him/her or ...?
this is my opinion on the topic, what's yours?
linkReply

Comments:
From: (Anonymous)
2006-03-17 01:54 pm (UTC)

Re: different dimensions

that makes sense to me of course it only works if you believe in the Field theory and the Big Bang Theory
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: dulcimergurl
2006-03-17 01:54 pm (UTC)

Re: different dimensions

that was me, sorry
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: hiiski
2006-03-20 03:31 pm (UTC)

Re: different dimensions

your exactly right
but if you really thinkg about it
there was a beginning
i cant comprehend any existences without it
theres the Everythings always been around theory
but that doesnt make sense in any direction i can lok at things
Thers a beginning and and end to everything

and that contradicts scientific theory also because supposedly theres been scientists "Watching" microwave signals from the big bang for Years


there is also alot of information supporting a field theory
Obviously String theory and Super String theory are getting increasingly popular in recent years but those theorys dont support a barrage of other case studys

an acceptable Theory of Everything has to be able to include Everything
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)